1.02 prove p implies q is equivalent to not q implies not p
Published 3 years ago • 687 plays • Length 4:56Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
5:00
1.21 - p implies q is equivalent to not p or q
-
4:37
1.1 - p implies q equivalent to ~p implies ~q
-
2:10
p implies q and p double implies q
-
1:32
logic p implies r ^ q implies r is equivalent (p v q) implies r [same consequence]
-
6:24
proving a tautology by using logical equivalences
-
10:22
improve iq - fix the equation #matchstickpuzzle #simplylogical
-
9:36
proofs in ql - existential elimination
-
4:19
determining if two statements are equivalent using a truth table
-
3:42
logical equivalence of two statements
-
2:07
check if two logic statements are equivalent
-
17:23
propositional logic − logical equivalences
-
5:35
10 - logical equivalence of conditional statements 1/2
-
4:54
geometry: 1-3 conditional , p implies q
-
13:20
false implies true is...
-
13:12
logical equivalence proof
-
1:50
logic [(p implies q ) ^ (p im plies r)] equivalent [p implies (q ^ r)] [same antecedence]
-
4:50
equivalent statements (demorgan's laws for logic, conditional, inverse, converse, contrapositive)
-
1:01
(2.2.21) unraveling truth values when p implies q and q is false
-
21:03
proving logical equivalence involving the biconditional
-
3:08
verify the deduction rule: if p then q. if (not p) then q. therefore q.
-
6:40
2.9: fundamental properties of logical equivalence
-
3:54
12 - logical equivalence using biconditional statements