attorneys who do not want to handle cases at the eeoc level are mistaken. it's that simple.
Published 1 year ago • 1.1K plays • Length 9:58Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
4:37
my attorney wants 40% of my case if s/he wins it, is that okay?
-
10:34
is it common for an employer to reject your demand and counter with a lower settlement figure?
-
18:15
are attorneys less willing to accept cases where a plaintiff has a mental health diagnosis?
-
8:38
my attorney won't explain why s/he thinks i should settle my employment case! is that okay?
-
26:32
why do some employment attorneys tell potential clients to file with the eeoc pro se?
-
5:26
why are my attorneys waiting for a right to sue letter from the eeoc?
-
18:03
why would an employment attorney want to settle a case before filing?
-
8:58
can my case pass its statute of limitations while the eeoc has it?
-
27:36
how do i formulate my demand for mediation? is mediation an interrogation?
-
20:37
7 signs you hired a bad lawyer (and what you can do about it)
-
26:36
what should i expect from a bad mediator? what is mandatory conciliation or mediation like?
-
16:54
a few of the many reasons why an employment attorney might not take your case
-
10:25
why might an employment defense attorney refuse to negotiate with you?
-
11:18
when is it too late to hire a lawyer in a workplace discrimination or sexual harassment case?
-
10:44
does the size of an employer matter for your discrimination case?
-
10:41
as in-house counsel, what is the first thing you do when a workplace claim comes to you?
-
7:49
my eeoc investigator says i don't need an attorney. he'll do it all for me. what do you think?
-
6:41
representing yourself in federal court with your right to sue letter
-
30:11
why do some attorneys drag out their cases?
-
4:38
can retaliation claims be easy to prove?
-
3:14
eeoc explained: understanding the eeoc's impact on your rights
-
6:53
decoding the eeoc: navigating new harassment guidelines