constexpr with untouched non-constexpr arguments: who is correct, clang or gcc?
Published 1 year ago • 2 plays • Length 2:19Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
4:38
constexpr c
-
11:50
constexpr - taking constants to the next level - learn modern c
-
10:54
pointers and constexpr in c
-
5:06
bjarne stroustrup: c implementations - clang, gcc, microsoft, and edg
-
1:28
linus torvalds "nothing better than c"
-
9:06
bjarne stroustrup: c zero-overhead principle and object-oriented programming
-
13:07
anders schau knatten: lvalues, rvalues, glvalues, prvalues, xvalues, help!
-
6:42
llvm clang vs gcc (c development on openbsd)
-
3:08
c const parameters explained 🧱
-
9:45
c from scratch: constexpr
-
0:55
llvm clang vs gcc | c/c
-
19:47
c weekly - ep 315 - constexpr vs static constexpr
-
1:04
c# constants π
-
1:10:13
cppcon 2017: ben deane & jason turner “constexpr all the things!”
-
23:03
2021 advanced c workshop - constexpr/consteval/constinit
-
3:24
what is a const? 🚫
-
4:44
c const reference
-
29:01
2019 llvm developers’ meeting: n. licker “the clang constexpr interpreter”