debate: to maintain or not to maintain? immunomodulators vs. pi - yes (proteasome inhibitors)
Published 8 years ago • 241 plays • Length 17:26Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
11:25
debate: to maintain or not to maintain? immunomodulators vs. pi - yes (imids)
-
15:59
debate: to maintain or not to maintain? immunomodulators vs. pi - no
-
9:02
debate: to maintain or not to maintain in myeloma? - yes, use imids
-
15:31
debate: to maintain or not to maintain in myeloma? - no, but if you must, use a proteasome inhibitor
-
13:10
debate: is transplant a necessity or a choice for myeloma patients? - yes
-
4:08
debate: humans can’t adapt fast enough climate change will overtake us
-
1:38
the debater
-
8:54
nuclear debate | katherine hamnett | proposition
-
9:19
debate: is transplant a necessity or a choice for myeloma patients? - no
-
13:17
debate: induction therapy for multiple myeloma - based on an imid and a proteasome inhibitor
-
12:00
late-stage investigational proteasome inhibitors and their potential impact on clinical outcomes
-
16:20
hyperandrogenism - the olympic boxing debate!
-
9:27
debate: should immunotherapy be used alone? - no, only in combination with chemotherapy
-
22:02
better proteasome inhibitor-based therapy in mm
-
11:56
debate: one size fits all? should everyone eligible get upfront autologous sct - con
-
1:34
dr. richardson on the synergy between immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors
-
14:37
debate: standard induction for myeloma - rvd
-
1:53
new molecular target in battle against colorectal cancer
-
12:26
debate: mrd, ready for primetime? - yes
-
15:10
debate: should alkylators be used upfront in transplant-ineligible myeloma patients? - no
-
14:34
debate: which initial therapy for younger fit patients is best? - cybord and bird