gtac 2016: code coverage is a strong predictor of test suite effectiveness
Published 7 years ago • 3.5K plays • Length 18:26Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
14:40
gtac 2015: coverage is not strongly correlated with test suite effectiveness
-
16:36
gtac 2016: directed test generation to detect loop inefficiencies
-
13:50
gtac 2014: test coverage at google
-
25:27
gtac 2014: beyond coverage: what lurks in test suites?
-
12:12
gtac 2016: the quirkier side of testing
-
29:44
gtac 2015: test suites and program analysis
-
16:31
gtac2016: using test run automation statistics to predict which tests to run
-
12:38
do you even test? (your code with cmake)
-
11:26
how to collect the code coverage of your tests in .net
-
41:24
dzmitry humianiuk - reportportal.io – how make ai analyze your test automation reports?
-
21:54
gtac2016: scale vs value - test automation at the bbc
-
17:21
gtac 2016: clusterrunner - making fast test-feedback easy through horizontal scaling
-
1:03:32
gtac 2016 - day 1 keynote
-
18:23
gtac 2016: need for speed - accelerate automation tests from 3 hours to 3 minutes
-
0:18
code coverage is such a useless measure, why even write tests? #shorts #softwareengineer
-
57:25
gtac 2011: the latest in google test tools
-
1:01:42
gtac 2016: how flaky tests in continuous integration
-
16:19
gtac 2016: finding bugs in c libraries using libfuzzer
-
14:43
gtac 2016: how i learned to crash test a server
-
0:53
is code coverage all that matters?
-
18:20
gtac 2015: hands off regression testing