impact factors were never intended to be a measure of scholarship - randy schekman
Published 8 years ago • 1K plays • Length 1:44Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
1:34
what is an alternative to impact factors? randy schekman, nobel laureate
-
1:46
nobel laureate randy schekman discusses high-impact factor journals
-
1:37
impact factors are taking us in the wrong direction - brian kobilka
-
1:28
"if you're not willing to gamble as a young person, you're never going to gamble" - randy schekman
-
1:19
impact factors are "a substitute for judgement" - nobel laureate michael brown
-
2:53
"i can categorically say i hate impact factors!" nobel laureate martin chalfie
-
1:14:54
naomi oreskes, "why trust science?"
-
4:29
a "nobel" day in the life of berkeley professor randy schekman
-
2:12
"i admire people who do fun things" tim hunt, nobel laureate
-
37:39
tracking your scholarly output (f24)
-
1:00
impact factors? what counts is the data - nobel laureate joseph goldstein
-
1:22
best alternative to impact factor | nobel laureate dr. randy schekman
-
2:25
nobel laureate peter doherty: impact factors are skewing science
-
1:07
"you learn a lot more by being open with other people" - randy schekman, nobel laureate
-
0:45
the best time for ideas? a boring seminar says nobel laureate randy schekman
-
3:05
"i knew it wasn't a hoax" - how randy schekman heard about his nobel prize
-
3:54
impact factor - academic publishing demystified
-
1:21
"you can't get buried in the detail" - randy schekman, nobel laureate
-
1:28
nobel laureate randy schekman: nobel prize inspiration initiative, maryland
-
1:51
impact factors what they are & how to find them
-
1:28:57
why trust science? a talk by professor naomi oreskes