inconsistency in conference peer review: revisiting the 2014 neurips experiment (paper explained)
Published 3 years ago • 16K plays • Length 26:00Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
11:10
peer review is still broken! the neurips 2021 review experiment (results are in)
-
58:46
a retrospective on the 2014 neurips experiment
-
![[rant] reviewer #2: how peer review is failing in machine learning](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/VgqHitvEbR0/mqdefault.jpg)
25:20
[rant] reviewer #2: how peer review is failing in machine learning
-
10:09
neurips 2020 changes to paper submission process
-
1:35:11
5. dr tomislav terzin - poreklo informacija u dnk
-
6:18
the problem with peer review - eric weinstein | the portal podcast clips
-
10:00
science works! how the scientific peer review process works
-
2:32
how does peer review make research more trustworthy?
-
59:05
shikun liu | vision-language reasoning with multi-modal experts
-
57:56
neurips 2019 conference recap from numenta
-
12:41
state-of-art-reviewing: a radical proposal to improve scientific publication
-
2:16
embarking on new nuclear
-
0:38
peer review and quality control in safety related systems is serious business