is `chmod -r ugo rwx /` safer than `chmod -r 777 /`? (2 solutions!!)
Published 3 years ago • 4 plays • Length 1:46Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
1:52
sudo chmod-r 777 / (2 solutions!!)
-
1:48
is it safe to chmod 777 everything? (2 solutions!!)
-
2:47
chmod 777 is not changing the permissions to 777 (2 solutions!!)
-
1:37
chmod 700 -r ~ - is it safe? (2 solutions!!)
-
2:40
ubuntu: why shouldn't /var/www have chmod 777? (2 solutions!!)
-
19:08
linux file permissions ( chmod, chown, chgrp )
-
7:56
never run these 3 linux commands
-
6:31
solved: chmod -r 777 / file permission access in linux | recover system file permission |linuxtak
-
2:24
unix & linux: how to give this permission (-r--rwx-rw-) using chmod? (2 solutions!!)
-
2:51
unix & linux: which is more widely used: chmod 777 or chmod a rwx (4 solutions!!)
-
1:44
directory permissions "r-s", chmod 655 does not change to "r-x", why? (2 solutions!!)
-
1:56
chmod problem in ubuntu (2 solutions!!)
-
2:26
sudo chmod -r 777 / (4 solutions!!)
-
1:40
description for command : chmod 777 (2 solutions!!)
-
1:38
unix & linux: accidentally changing permission of '/' directory to 'chmod 660 ' (2 solutions!!)
-
2:30
does "chmod 777 .\* -r" chmod parent directories (..)? (4 solutions!!)
-
2:17
chmod 777: how to make all files become "rwx" (4 solutions!!)
-
2:06
whats the difference between chmod 777 and chmod 7777 (3 solutions!!)
-
1:32
missuse of chmod -r 777 ./
-
2:04
unix & linux: can `chmod -r 777 /bin` be recovered from? (2 solutions!!)
-
1:46
ubuntu: chmod files only in all subdirectories (2 solutions!!)
-
1:23
ubuntu: /var/www permissions have been changed with chmod -r 777