is peer review biased toward statistical significance? - abel brodeur | 2021 bitss annual meeting
Published 3 years ago • 101 plays • Length 22:57Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
8:19:24
2018 bitss annual meeting
-
21:51
methods matter abel brodeur
-
1:22:05
panel: methods for correcting publication bias and specification search | bitss annual meeting 2019
-
5:30
2016 leamer-rosenthal prizes for open social science: abel brodeur, university of ottawa
-
6:42
analytical variation: imprecision and bias
-
52:48
microservices and rules engines – a blast from the past - udi dahan
-
5:49
is peer review broken?
-
20:17
ted miguel - introduction and reflections on bitss at 10 10th bitss annual meeting
-
26:52
bias, spin, and problems with transparency of research
-
1:28:00
bias in reporting and publication of scientific research
-
1:49
recognizing potential bias in peer review
-
6:48
peer review bias
-
12:52
re-adapt: do bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages for comparative effectiveness research?
-
16:53
session 7: question and answer
-
6:32
split segments: a/b testing
-
4:05
aom unconscious biases in peer review
-
34:38
pim course: lecture 10: benchmarking and workload suitability on pim - fall 2022
-
1:32:19
why is interoperability and standardization important?
-
52:04
ab-tests, lies, damned lies, and statistics. - emil cardell
-
41:56
day 1 | leamer-rosenthal prizes for open social science: award ceremony
-
1:40
prof. steven goodman on "publication bias"