public hearings update 17 - a human rights act would improve public decision-making
Published 15 years ago • 110 plays • Length 0:58Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
0:34
public hearings update 27 - a human rights act would improve public service delivery
-
1:05
public hearings update 16 - the impact of the act human rights act
-
0:27
public hearings update 30 - john hatzistergos on why he opposes a human rights act
-
1:13
public hearings update 41 - alternatives to a human rights act
-
0:54
public hearings update 29 - prof helen irving on why she opposes a human rights act
-
44:14
watch our exclusive briefing with francesca albanese, united nations special rapporteur.
-
4:56
julian burnside qc talks human rights.
-
2:27
what does amnesty international do?
-
0:49
public hearings update 26 - catherine branson on why australia needs a human rights act
-
1:18
public hearings update 24 - addressing the criticism that human rights are too "vague"
-
0:25
public hearings update 39 - human rights and marginalised groups
-
0:35
public hearings update 18 - australia should follow the example of the uk human rights act
-
0:51
public hearings update 6 - a human rights act would meet australia's international obligations
-
0:37
public hearings update 33 - the position of the opposition in relation to a human rights act
-
0:38
public hearings update 42 - australians want better protections for human rights
-
0:46
public hearings update 28 - a more dynamic model of human rights protection
-
1:46
public hearings update 7 - how would the mentally ill be impacted by a human rights act?
-
0:30
public hearings update 37 - safeguarding human rights depends on the political process
-
0:41
public hearings update 36 - mechanisms for assessing human rights compatibility
-
0:33
public hearings update 35 - a human rights act is the only way to achieve universal protection
-
0:20
public hearings update 19 - alan anderson on the potential problems with human rights instruments
-
0:45
public hearings update 22 - a common law approach to human rights is not enough