snaps, flatpaks and appimages do very different things! (each has its purpose)
Published 1 year ago • 51K plays • Length 13:16Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
14:15
i think i like appimages more than snaps and flatpaks
-
15:24
keep your snaps and flatpaks, i'll take appimages!
-
4:08
for some apps, it's better to install the snap or flatpak
-
18:52
snaps vs flatpaks vs appimages vs packages: benchmarks, missing features & differences
-
![what are snaps? [snaps explained]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ESb8y40GnFw/mqdefault.jpg)
1:46
what are snaps? [snaps explained]
-
12:50
why i no longer use flatpak
-
9:56
stop using apt
-
19:39
linux packaging formats explained: flatpak vs snaps vs deb & rpm vs appimage vs aur
-
14:12
flatpak vs snaps vs appimage vs packages - linux packaging formats compared
-
21:57
an overview of snap packages
-
2:37
when to use flatpak
-
20:38
snap v flatpak v appimage - in depth pros & cons of universal packaging
-
16:24
triggered by snaps/flatpaks destroying linux! (conspiracy theory)
-
8:24
is the hate for snap packages warranted?
-
11:21
do ubuntu's snap deserve so much negativity?
-
10:05
why do people cheat at online games?
-
10:01
mad about snap? remove them. use flatpaks instead.
-
13:11
the biggest failure of linux is package management
-
12:31
managing appimages is easy with "am" application manager
-
13:43
so what is an appimage and should you even care?
-
1:00:10
storage snapshots explained - based on netapp 7-mode
-
14:37
my response to distrotube