urologic debate part 1: mri vs. molecular markers: which one should i use? mri perspective
Published 3 years ago • 268 plays • Length 14:24Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
11:39
urologic debate part 2: mri vs. molecular markers: which one should i use? markers perspective
-
14:05
integrating mri and molecular markers to detect aggressive prostate cancer
-
10:20
current clinical utility of mri and multi-modality imaging
-
56:29
prostate cancer biomarkers and their role in the mri era | urology grand rounds
-
34:57
should mri be used to monitor for as? con argument
-
30:47
introduction to liver mri: approach and case-based course
-
4:34
the fear of cancer & choosing active surveillance | ask a prostate expert, mark scholz, md
-
29:11
tale of two tumors: wilms tumor management | urology grand rounds
-
0:16
doctor vs. nurse: $ over 5 years #shorts
-
4:18
cases in radiology: episode 1 (neuroradiology, ct, mri)
-
5:01
daily debate: imaging in urology
-
28:33
active surveillance results and implications of prospective studies
-
11:22
multi parametric mri
-
1:03:30
evolving role of mri and genomics in active surveillance for prostate cancer
-
20:15
mri first: the role of mri in biopsy naïve patients
-
21:21
should mri be used to monitor for as? pro argument
-
0:14
highest paid healthcare workers 💰 (that aren't medical doctors) #shorts
-
2:31
an mri-based approach to prostate cancer diagnosis: a urologist’s stance in the debate
-
19:37
the ups and downs of mri biopsy
-
17:28
do we need certification to read prostate mri; the case against
-
46:26
introduction to prostate mri and pi-rads: approach and principles
-
11:02
integrated multi modality diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer