using composite failure rates instead of generic failure rates?
Published 5 years ago • 483 plays • Length 55:45Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
34:34
optional cost/sif design – composite failure rates instead of generic failure rates
-
14:29
exida explains - understanding failure rates (from the iec 61511 perspective)
-
12:42
exida explains failure rates
-
12:12
comparing failure rates
-
9:47
getting good failure rate data - part 1: safety design optimization - failure rate
-
41:45
how safe are you? the importance of functional safety and realistic failure rates
-
45:21
determining acceptable failure rates for use in safety critical calculations
-
24:00
safety system redundancy - is it worth the money?
-
48:30
back to basics – systematic capability, architectural constraints and pfd? oh my!
-
9:54
introduction to failure modes
-
38:58
failure rate analysis paralysis
-
58:25
iec 61511 and failure rates
-
1:03:56
failure rate classification-safe or dangerous: how to use fail low and fail high failures
-
53:17
does having an integrated valve assembly actually create lower failure rates?
-
1:01:41
understanding published equipment failure rates
-
35:54
safe failure rate? i don't need that!
-
44:35
how site operations and maintenance impact equipment failure rates
-
42:23
validation of given failure rate data for process industry applications
-
46:44
comparing mechanical failure rates
-
31:27
random and systematic failures – issues and solutions
-
48:06
mechanical failure rates: explaining the differences