why is there such a big difference between "size" and "size on disk"? (9 solutions!!)
Published 4 years ago • 334 plays • Length 6:38Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
4:32
what is the difference between "size" and "size on disk?" (4 solutions!!)
-
2:56
size and size on disk massive bloat (2 solutions!!)
-
1:15
why is "size on disk" much bigger than "size" when i copy data from ntfs to exfat?
-
3:21
what is the difference between "used space", "size" and "size on disk"? (5 solutions!!)
-
1:26
unix & linux: difference between size and size on disk on a pc? why is size on disk always greater?
-
8:31
drive sector sizes explained
-
3:38
size vs size on disk windows 8/7/vista
-
2:13
using a 2048 kilobytes allocation unit size for large files
-
1:23
file allocation size issue: size on disk larger than expected
-
1:41
ubuntu: difference between filesize and size on disk (2 solutions!!)
-
1:35
devops & sysadmins: big difference size and size on disk
-
1:55
how can the size on disk be smaller than size? (3 solutions!!)
-
1:53
windows folder size far bigger than all files and folders within combined (3 solutions!!)
-
2:48
windows - file size differs from size on disk? (3 solutions!!)
-
2:38
size is larger than "size on disk" in ntfs
-
1:33
fixed size disk vs dynamically allocated: is there a performance difference on an ssd?
-
3:47
how to determine the actual size on disk for a folder in windows? (2 solutions!!)
-
2:19
reducing size and size on the disk of a file or folder?
-
2:02
unix & linux: why is the difference in file size and it's size on disk bigger than 4 kib?
-
1:38
windows 10 comparing size on disk of two folders (2 solutions!!)
-
1:25
real hard drive size is lower than advertised size
-
2:02
my ssd is full, but the files don't add up to the capacity