snaps, flatpaks, pros and cons
Published 6 years ago • 14K plays • Length 11:52Download video MP4
Download video MP3
Similar videos
-
5:30
why do people hate snap packages?
-
13:16
snaps, flatpaks and appimages do very different things! (each has its purpose)
-
11:08
huge speed differences! flatpak vs. snap vs. appimage
-
19:39
linux packaging formats explained: flatpak vs snaps vs deb & rpm vs appimage vs aur
-
2:37
when to use flatpak
-
8:06
why i have a problem with snaps
-
28:46
i switched to linux 30 days ago... how did it go?
-
23:36
sipp ram for the hummingboard, a working "thec64" mini, and some super sharp probes
-
12:59
all-flash nas fight: diy or buy – round iii!
-
1:01:08
appimages, flatpaks, snaps...a discussion
-
18:52
snaps vs flatpaks vs appimages vs packages: benchmarks, missing features & differences
-
22:32
snaps vs flatpaks: which is better?
-
20:38
snap v flatpak v appimage - in depth pros & cons of universal packaging
-
56:50
snaps, flatpaks, appimages as a software base?
-
14:12
flatpak vs snaps vs appimage vs packages - linux packaging formats compared
-
27:10
the linux crash course - what are "snap" packages?
-
12:50
why i no longer use flatpak
-
12:34
appimage vs snaps vs flatpak: what should you use?
-
15:24
keep your snaps and flatpaks, i'll take appimages!
-
19:58
is ubuntu a bad linux distro?
-
17:40
is too much flatpak really good? problems with flatpak and flathub and installation recommendation
-
15:04
peppermintos pcnetspec edition